Tenders Are Invited For Active And Safe Siemianowice in Poland

Work Detail

Part 1: Stick For Dogs Ps Park Ciapkowo At Ul. Michałkowicka (Active And Safe Siemianowice) - Design And Build.1) The Subject Of The Contract Is The Implementation Of Complete Design Documentation And Implementation Of Construction Works According To The Developed Documentation For The Task Entitled Psi Park Ciapkowo Dog Run At Ul. Michałkowicka (Active And Safe Siemianowice) - Design And Build. The Investment Task Includes: A) Comprehensive Project Documentation, Including The Land Use Project To The Extent Necessary To Submit The Intention To Perform Construction Works, B) Execution, Based On The Abovementioned Documentation, Construction Works, In Order To Implement The Investment Task In Question Together With The Delivery And Assembly Of All Necessary Equipment And Equipment Resulting From This Documentation, C) Performing Authors Supervision, D) Preparing Receipt Documentation, Including As-Built Documentation 2) Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Is: A) Functional And Utility Program (Addition No. 3A To Swz), B) Designed Contract Provisions (Addition No. 4A Swz) .- Hereinafter Referred To As Documentation. 3) For The Subject Of The Contract, The Selected Contractor Will Grant The Contracting Authority A Guarantee And Warranty For The Period In Accordance With The Contractors Offer, But Not Shorter Than 60 Months From The Day Of The Day After The Day Of The Protocol Receipt Without Reservations Of The Entire Subject Of The Contract. 4) The Ordering Party Described The Subject Of The Order Without Indicating Trademarks, Patents Or Origin, Source Or Special Process That Characterizes The Product Or Service Provided By A Specific Contractor. If The Contractor Finds That The Subject Of The Contract Was Described In The Manner Referred To In Article 99 (5) Of The Act, I.E. The Origin (Brand, Trademark, Manufacturer, Supplier) Of The Materials Was Indicated, And The Criteria Used To Assess The Equivalence Were Not Given, He Should Ask The Contracting Authority To Indicate Which Criteria Will Be Used To Assess Equivalence. 5) If In The Documentation Constituting A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract In The Part 1 There Will Be References To Standards, Technical Assessments, Technical Specifications And Technical Reference Systems Referred To In Art. 101 Para. 1 Point 2 And Para. 3 Of The Pzp Act, The Contracting Authority Allows Equivalent Solutions Described. The Use Of A Given Standard In The Documentation, Technical Assessment, Technical Specifications And The Technical Reference System Is Only Aimed At Clarifying The Level Of Expectations Of The Employer In Relation To A Specific Material/Device/Product. 6) The Contracting Authority In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Took Into Account The Requirements For Availability For Disabled People And Design For All Users Referred To Art. 100 Para. 1 Pzp.7) The Ordering Party In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Did Not Specify The Requirement

Contact Information